2025 CSP Symposium — After Action Report
Graduate Program — Community Service Practice

2025 CSP
Symposium

A structured assessment of what worked, what failed, and what must change before the next cycle begins.

15Areas Assessed
40%Presented Without an Evaluator
1 in 3Students Behind on Requirements
After Action Report May 2025
Overview

What This Report Is For

15 operational areas assessed across program foundations, communication, and event logistics. Each recommendation names the issue, the responsible role, the priority, and the standard for success.

The Annual Community Service Practice Symposium is a major academic event uniting students, faculty, and community organizations. Students who complete the program invest 200 or more hours of community service and prepare formal presentations of their work.

Problems that aren't named don't get solved. They get repeated.

The 2025 Symposium was produced against a backdrop of significant compliance deficits entering the event: approximately one third of students had not completed their designated service hours, and one third had not fulfilled their workshop attendance requirements. On the day itself, 40% of presenting students waited through their full assigned slot without an evaluator ever arriving.

These numbers are not incidental. They reflect systemic failures in oversight, communication, and role clarity that this report addresses directly. The goal is not to assign blame. The goal is to make it structurally harder for the same failures to occur in 2026.

Each recommendation below identifies the responsible role — Program Coordinator, Manager of Community Partnerships, or Program Chair — along with a priority level and a measurable standard for success.

Category One

Program Foundations

Student Experience, Expectations & Structure

I
01Site Assignment PolicyStructural
Owner: Manager of Community Partnerships Priority: Critical
Issue

Multiple students were placed at more than one service site, with some rotating through up to three placements. This undermines consistency, continuity, and fair access — and contributes directly to the compliance gap in which one third of students had not completed their required hours by the time of the Symposium.

  • Each student is assigned to one site only. Exceptions require documented extenuating circumstances such as discrimination or prejudice.
  • Communicate this policy clearly during orientation and onboarding.
  • Update advisor scripts and all onboarding materials to reflect the one-site rule.
  • Include FAQs in orientation materials to preempt common misconceptions.

Success looks like: 90% or more of students are assigned to and complete the practicum at a single site. Reassignments are documented exceptions, not routine occurrences. All assignments are finalized and logged by September 30.

02Service Hour Tracking & ComplianceOperational
Owner: Program Coordinator Priority: Critical
Issue

Approximately one third of students had not completed their designated 200 service hours by the time of the Symposium. This is not a student failure — it is a monitoring failure. Without structured check-ins and real-time visibility into hour completion, non-compliance accumulates invisibly until it is too late to correct.

  • Utilize Time2Track exclusively for all service hour tracking.
  • Reinforce submission deadlines and platform expectations at orientation.
  • Conduct milestone check-ins in October, January, and March — with formal written outreach to any student below threshold.
  • Provide clear guidance for supervisor validation within the platform.
  • Students who have not met hour requirements by April 1 are ineligible to present at the Symposium. This policy must be stated in writing at orientation.

Success looks like: 90% or more of registered students have completed their required hours by April 1. No student presents at the Symposium without confirmed hour completion.

03Workshop Attendance RequirementsStructural
Owner: Program Coordinator Priority: Near-Term
Issue

The practicum requires students to attend three designated workshops virtually throughout the academic year. These are a separate program requirement from the Symposium itself — the Symposium is the culmination of the practicum, not a replacement for the workshop obligation. One third of students had not fulfilled this requirement by the time of the Symposium, indicating that the tracking and enforcement of year-long obligations is not functioning. What cannot be measured cannot be managed.

  • Communicate the three-workshop virtual requirement explicitly at orientation, separate from Symposium logistics.
  • Track workshop attendance systematically throughout the year — not through self-report, and not only at the point of Symposium registration.
  • Include workshop completion status in each milestone check-in alongside service hours.
  • Students who have not completed all three workshops by April 1 are ineligible to present at the Symposium. This must be stated in writing at orientation and reiterated at each milestone check-in.

Success looks like: All three workshop completion rates are tracked in real time throughout the year. 90% or more of registered presenters have met the workshop requirement by April 1.

04Orientation & Make-Up PolicyStructural
Owner: Program Coordinator Priority: Near-Term
  • Hold one orientation (live and virtual) in August.
  • Provide a summary Adobe Express reference page for participants.
  • Clarify and enforce: one Symposium and one make-up only per student.
  • Orientation must include explicit written statements of hour requirements, workshop requirements, and eligibility thresholds for Symposium participation.

Success looks like: 100% of enrolled students attend orientation or the recorded virtual equivalent. Eligibility requirements are signed and acknowledged in writing by each student.

Category Two

Communication & Coordination

Clarity, Consistency & Scheduling

II
05Communication StrategyOperational
Owner: Program Coordinator Priority: Near-Term
  • Replace dense email chains with Adobe Express one-pagers for key updates.
  • Launch monthly communications from August through April covering orientation, deadlines, eligibility thresholds, and participant roles.
  • All communications must reference the eligibility requirements for Symposium participation — not just logistical details.

Success looks like: Monthly communications are sent on schedule August through April. Each communication includes an eligibility status reminder.

06Faculty & Institutional Buy-InStructural
Owner: Program Chair Priority: Critical
Issue

Faculty continued to hold classes during the Symposium window, directly undermining what was described as the program's marquee event. The downstream consequence was significant: between 50 and 60 percent of students could only present during the designated lunch block. That block was intended as a catered meal and community gathering — not a presentation window. Students moved directly from class to presenting (frequently to no evaluator), then back to class. Simultaneously, the lunch block did not have sufficient rooms or available time slots to absorb that volume of presentations. The catered meal went largely to waste because attendees were unaware it was available. None of this is a scheduling problem. It is a buy-in problem — and the Program Chair is the appropriate authority to resolve it.

  • Begin faculty engagement no later than October — not the week of the event.
  • The Program Chair must formally request that faculty designate the Symposium as required curriculum and cancel conflicting classes for the full event day.
  • Institutional leadership must communicate the priority of this event to all relevant departments in writing before the start of the academic year.
  • The lunch block must be protected as a meal and community moment — not absorbed as overflow presentation capacity.

Success looks like: Zero classes are held during the Symposium window. Presentations are distributed across the full event day. The lunch block is used as intended. Faculty commitment is secured and documented before November 1.

07Student SchedulingOperational
Owner: Program Coordinator Priority: Near-Term
  • Create a first-come, first-served sign-up system using a scheduling platform. Recommended: Calendly, YouCanBookMe, Google Calendar Appointment Slots, or Microsoft Bookings.
  • Automate time slot confirmations to reduce manual coordination burden and create a clear record of scheduled presenters.
  • Only students who have met eligibility requirements by April 1 may schedule a presentation slot.

Success looks like: All presentation slots are filled by confirmed, eligible students by April 15. No walk-in presentations are permitted.

08Evaluator RecruitmentCritical
Owner: Program Coordinator Priority: Critical
Critical Issue

40% of presenting students waited through their full assigned slot without an evaluator ever arriving. These students had completed 200 hours of community service, satisfied their program requirements, and invested substantial time preparing their presentations. The failure to provide evaluators is not a logistical oversight — it is a fundamental breach of the program's obligation to its students.

  • Begin evaluator outreach in February — not the week of the event.
  • Assign one evaluator per four presentations, confirmed in writing.
  • Provide each evaluator with a scoring rubric and brief training session in advance of the event.
  • Maintain a day-of evaluator check-in list. Any no-show must be covered by a designated backup before the session begins.
  • No presentation slot opens without a confirmed evaluator assigned to it.

Success looks like: 100% of presenting students receive an evaluation. Zero students present without an assigned evaluator present.

Category Three

Event Logistics

Day-of Operations, Presentation Management & Space Setup

III
09Event Itinerary & Attendee CommunicationOperational
Owner: Program Coordinator Priority: Near-Term
Issue

No clear event itinerary was distributed to attendees. The Symposium included a keynote speaker, a catered breakfast, and a catered lunch — none of which were adequately communicated in advance. As a result, significant portions of both meals went to waste because attendees were unaware food was available or when and where to access it. The speaker's session was similarly undersupported due to a lack of advance communication about the program.

  • Publish a complete event itinerary — including speaker session, meal times, presentation blocks, and room assignments — no later than one week before the event.
  • Send a day-before reminder to all registered attendees with the full schedule and a floor map.
  • Post physical signage at the entrance and at each meal station indicating times and locations.
  • Designate a volunteer to make verbal announcements at meal transitions to direct attendees.

Success looks like: Attendees arrive knowing the full schedule. Meal attendance reflects actual headcount. Speaker session is well-attended. No food goes to waste due to lack of awareness.

10Room ReservationsOperational
Owner: Program Coordinator Priority: Near-Term
  • Submit room reservations through the Registrar by December.
  • Confirm that all rooms meet AV and seating requirements before finalizing.

Success looks like: All rooms confirmed with AV requirements verified by December 31.

11Easel & Space AssignmentsOperational
Owner: Program Coordinator Priority: Pre-Event
  • Pre-assign poster and exhibition easels in advance using a floor diagram with signage.
  • Maintain a master scheduling sheet accessible to all event staff on the day.

Success looks like: Floor diagram and assignments distributed to all staff one week before the event. No day-of scramble for space.

12Workshop & Panel LogisticsOperational
Owner: Program Coordinator Priority: Pre-Event
  • Limit workshops and panels to 30 minutes to maintain event pacing.
  • Assign a timekeeper to each workshop room.

Success looks like: All workshops begin and end on schedule. No session runs over without documented cause.

13Check-In StationOperational
Owner: Program Coordinator Priority: Pre-Event
  • Staff a designated check-in station with name tags, a floor map, and printed schedules.
  • Staff with volunteers or work-study students trained to answer FAQs and provide direction.

Success looks like: Check-in station is staffed and operational 30 minutes before the event opens. All attendees are checked in within the first 15 minutes of their arrival window.

14Poster PresentationsOperational
Owner: Program Coordinator Priority: Near-Term
  • Require poster file submissions two weeks before the event to allow for printing.
  • Establish a clear payment workflow for university-funded printing.
  • Use a Google Form for file submissions and tracking.

Success looks like: All posters submitted, printed, and staged before event day. Zero day-of printing requests.

15Catering CoordinationOperational
Owner: Program Coordinator Priority: Pre-Event
  • Confirm dietary needs and headcount 30 days before the event.
  • Lock in menu and vendor three weeks prior.
  • Coordinate delivery logistics and post-event cleanup in advance.

Success looks like: Catering confirmed three weeks out. No day-of vendor coordination required.

Additional Considerations

Strategic Enhancements

Supporting recommendations to strengthen event infrastructure and community experience.

Accessibility

Ensure ADA-compliant rooms and all event documents meet accessibility standards across formats.

Volunteers

Pre-assign volunteer roles: greeter, runner, and tech support. No day-of improvisation on critical positions.

Media

Appoint a dedicated photo and video team for event documentation and institutional coverage.

Feedback

Distribute post-event surveys to both presenters and evaluators within 48 hours of the event.

Contingency

Develop backup plans for technology failure, safety disruptions, and evaluator absence before the event date. Maintain a list of backup evaluators who can be activated on short notice.

Emergency

Share emergency contacts and protocols with all staff and volunteers prior to event day.

Planning Cycle

Timeline Snapshot

Key milestones for the 2026 planning cycle, July through May.

July
Begin planning cycle. Set communication calendar. Assign ownership of each operational area.
August
Launch communication campaign. Host orientation (live and virtual). Distribute Adobe Express summary page.
September
Begin service hour tracking via Time2Track. Support early submissions. Clarify site assignment expectations.
October
Secure faculty buy-in. Conduct first milestone check-in. Confirm service site assignments are finalized.
December
Submit room reservation requests. Confirm AV and seating requirements.
January
Send "Welcome Back" communications. Conduct second milestone check-in via Time2Track.
February
Begin evaluator recruitment. Assign one evaluator per four presentations. Distribute rubrics and training materials.
March
Send final reminders. Conduct third milestone check-in. Confirm evaluator commitments in writing.
April
Collect poster submissions. Finalize food orders and room confirmations. Distribute volunteer role assignments.
May
Execute event. Deploy post-event surveys within 48 hours. Begin 2027 planning cycle debrief.
Graduate Program — CSP After Action Report — 2025 CSP Symposium Prepared May 2025